Essay on Anna Quindlen’s “A Quilt of a Country” Essay

People are such disparate things, they range from black to discolor to boy and girl, and of all the nations on Earth, Id hand to distinguish that the States is the unrivalled turn uplandish that exemplifies that the most. Unlike new(prenominal) formula nations, populate with a certain groups of people who hold certain types of beliefs, the States is a nation made up of all the ethnicities of the realism, and unlike other normal nations, the inhabitants of the States dont tend to get along really well. Anna Quindlen writes about why America shouldnt work, yet does, in a short article titled A Quilt of a Country. She uses stiff evidence and valid argument to tide over her thesis, and she also divides her article into two eliminate sections the number 1 designated to proving why America shouldnt work, and the second designated to why it does work. These two in conjunction culminate into an effective argument, that settles that America shouldnt work, and yet miraculousl y does. In the first half of the article, she immediately starts by stating a part of her advance, America is a nation of conflicting and interchanging parts, and obligation afterwords attacks the notion it was founded on by pointing out that most people make do themselves to be better than someone else.This serves to support her claim, that America shouldnt work, by disproving its real foundations. She thence uses a historians quote in order to build off of and make her relation, that America is a quilt. This analogy reinforces her claim by drawing a striking comparison amongst America and a quilt and helps readers interpret what shes saying. later onwords she says that the American consensus to palm everyone equally has failed spectacularly, and proves it by listing numerous mannikins of social and racial prejudice, such as the lynching of blacks and the discrimination against women. Not only does this butcher Americas foundations(again), it also makes the allusion that A merica is a very violent repose filled with turmoil. Both of these would support the judgment that America shouldnt have worked in the first place, which is her claim. With all those examples of failure and in safeice in mind, she asserts that it would be hard to explain to children why America is great, which also supports her claim because it makes some other inference that America shouldnt work. Annas third divide is give to addressing a counterclaim, that the rise of ethnic-based pride has undermined unity. She argues that America has always been undermined by differences in race, and this new rise of pride has amounted to nothing.Although the counterclaim in this paragraphdoesnt directly oppose Annas claim, perhaps it fifty-fifty supports it, the evidence and creatoring she uses supports the idea that America shouldnt work. Quindlens account of past Philadelphia is a one of distaste and hostility, and her description of other cities that existed around the same epoch ar e just as bleak. Like the other pieces of evidence, these two support her claim by giving America the appearance of a body politic thats in internal conflict, and shouldnt work. She finally moves into her last paragraph in the first half, in which she first ponders the existence of this nation, and then depicts it as being filled with conflict. Her sentences in this paragraph follow a standardized structure, at least in the beginning, in which she starts out with What is the point of a nation in which, and proceeds to give a negative example of the denizens of America. This repeating acts to cement the idea that America is dysfunctional, which is the core of her claim, and after the repetition stops she ends the paragraph with a change of tone, when she says that despite all of this, America compose stands.This change of tone signals the transition into the second half, in which she moves on from explaining why America shouldnt work, to why America does work. Unlike the first hal f, where Anna Quindlens tone implies that America is a collection of warring ethnicities, she changes her diction from doubtful to dumbfounded in order to better suit her goal, proving that America does work. She starts out by claiming that the motive America remains intact is a commonality enemy. Anna supports her reason by listing some examples of wars where we were united against a single entity, such as the cold and world wars. After that, she points out that during clocks where we didnt have a nation to fight against, we were less(prenominal) united and more separate. She also points out that we became reunited as a root of 9/11. This supports her reason because through deductive reasoning, the reader concludes that a common enemy is what binds the people of America. These pieces of evidence support her central thesis because they prove that the existence of an enemy makes us united, which would in turn make us work together and subsequently make America work better, which is her claim. In the future(a) paragraph, however, she starts out by bringing up that most Americans still say that The U.S. is a unique country that stands for something special in the world, even during peace time.This would imply that theres another reason why Americas still united, and Anna Quindlenuses this quote to justify her next sentence. Her next sentence which depicts America in a fashion that makes it calculate implausible, supports the part of her claim that says America shouldnt work, and she also says that it somehow does, annoyingly. This back up the second half of her claim, America does work. In the last sentence, she finally states what the other reason for America working is two strains of doings. She says that the first strain of behavior is the hardworking psyche of Americans, and the second strain is the pilgrim-like persona of immigrants. Her support for her reason is a quote that the immigrants of a couple decades ago are just like the immigrants of tod ay, who work hard and are subsequently making a living, which would allude to the idea that these personalities persist throughout all of America, regardless of time or space. With that in mind, it supports her claim because it shows that we all have something in common, and and then can become unified more easily, which makes America work better.After all of that, she moves onto her very last paragraph her conclusion. She starts off by cerebrate what word best describes the people who live in America, from tolerance to pride, and then mirrors her claim by describing America as a ludicrous idea that shouldnt work, yet does. She then says that the people of America are so varying, you could trace back the heritage to each person who died during 9/11 to every single country in the world this analogy assist to the allusion that America is a collage of disparate and disjointed parts. Finally, in the very last sentences of the article, she draws a connection to the beginning of the ar ticle by reusing the phrases love child nation, and improbable idea, and by mirroring the beginning and last statements of her article, she creates a lasting daze on the reader.Anna Quindlens article, A Quilt of a Country, uses a wide range of evidence in order to validate her reasons, from quotes to analogies to explanations, and not only are they effective, they all help support her central thesis, one way or the other. Anna also divided her article into two separate sections, in which she focused on supporting one aspect of her claim in each. This let her orientate and tune her words for a peculiar(prenominal) purpose, and not flood the reader with conflicting conclusions. In the end, Anna succeeded in proving why America shouldnt work, yet does, and she succeeded in proving that America is composed of different, even conflicting ethnicities. People truly are such disparate things, as Anna Quindlen would agree, they range fromblack to white to boy and girl, and America is the one country that exemplifies that the most. Unlike other nations, Americas truly a esteem when it works.