Thursday, May 30, 2019
The Electoral College: Rationale and Process Essay -- History Governme
The Founding Fathers wanted to distinguish the newly formed United States from a pure democracy. The Framers defined democracy as government decisions make directly by the people. They decided to use a republic form of government because it promised wiser government. This type of government would allow decisions to be made by representatives elected by people.The one issue styled under this republican representation was the process on how to choose a president. This process has been the source of continuing controversy for over two hundred years. There have been more attempts to change the twelfth amendment than every other provision in the Constitution. Ironically, in the debates precedent the ratification of the Constitution, the method of presidential selection was not very controversial. Alexander Hamilton wrote, The mode of appointment of the chief magistrate of the United States is almost the only part of the system, of any consequence which has escaped without severe censur e or which has received the slightest mark of approbation from its opponents (Wright 56).Alexander Hamilton was the chief architect of the electoral college since he distrusted frequent democracy. He said that the electoral college would ensure that a few men of insight and reflection would select the ablest president. Specifically, he wrote, A small number of persons, selected by their fellow-citizens from the world-wide mass would act under circumstances favorable to deliberation (Wright 59). Hamilton believed that the electoral college system would reduce civic unrest if public participation were directed to certify the results of a presidential election. He noted that the electoral college concept was less susceptible to political manipulation.However, the United States has moved away from the original republicanism rationale undergo by the Founding Fathers. Opponents of the electoral college, such as author Lawrence Longley state, Todays advancement in communications, compu ters, and polling computations has permitted our society to accept results the popular vote with confidence (18). However, the question remains, has the electoral college outlived it original intent and purpose? I believe that we need the electoral college to alleviate future problems that are associated with direct vote presidential elections. Moreover, we have use this system to select pr... ...wer. If it is proposed to change the balance of power of one of the elements of the solar system, it is necessary to consider the others. (Glennon 72).Much contemplation has been focused on solutions to resolve the perceive electoral college problems. However, too often these reformers ignore the rest of the political solar system. Their reforms vary because each have different objectives. These varying objectives are hoped to reinforce the value of federalism, to increase voters enthusiasm of national politics, lessen the danger of a national recount, strengthen (or weaken) the two-party system, or to elect better presidents. Each of these proposed reforms have somewhat ramifications on our political solar system.Today, Americans take pride in our history of peaceful transitions of power. Being so, the electoral college must be considered as a important centerpiece to this transition. It is reassuring to know that a handful of average citizens delegated responsibility by their states have been able to achieve what Mexico and the Philippines have not, undisputed electoral results derived from the popular vote. The electoral college has proven to be our political stability.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment