Chief Justice Earl Warren Essay

President Dwight Eisenhower appointed Earl Warren as the fourteenth Chief legal expert of the Supreme motor lodge in 1953. Warren had been the governor of California twice and was in like manner on the republican ticket for Vice President under Thomas Dewey. It was assumed that Warren would pickup where his successor Fred Vinson unexpended off as a conservative member of the Supreme Court, but instead Warren positioned himself as a liberal. When Warren took over as Chief Justice, justices who aligned with legal activism and those who were in favor of judicial restraint divided the Supreme Court. One of Warrens goals was to renew the Supreme Courts role in defending individual rights.Warren presided over s ever soal civil rights landmark cases including chocolate-brown vs. Board of reproduction I and II, which would spark the great civil rights movement. Warren also presided over cases such as McGowan vs. atomic number 101 and also Tropp vs. Dulles.In Brown vs. the Board of Ed ucation, Warren was greatly criticized for non appealing to the precedent (Plessy vs. Ferguson), and earlier relying on common sense and fairness. In Chief Justices Warrens dissenting opinion of Brown vs. Board of Education I, he conveyd Today, education is perhaps the or so important function of state and local governments . To separate them from others of similar age and qualifications solely because of their race generates a feeling of inferiority as to their status in the community.. .that may affect their hearts and minds in a way unlikely to ever be undone. His final statement emphasized that separate but satisfactory facilities are inherently unequal, and also that such a doctrine deprived the plaintiffs of the equal protection of the laws guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment.The unanimous finale uncoiled previous twists of the Constitution that focused solely on the belief that separate but equal facilities did not imply any type of racial inferiority. In 1966 Warr en and his court had another study decision to deal with, Miranda v. State of Arizona. The case dealt with criminal suspects and their rights. The courts decision was that criminal suspects had to be informed of theirrights before questioning. Warren and the Supreme Court also ruled decisions dealing with legislative apportionment, the elemental rights of citizenship, and limitation of the use of libel laws. Again, Warren received both criticism and praise as a result of his judicial performances.After such landmark cases, Warrens leadership in these cases became a political institution known as The Warren Court, with a heavy emphasis on equivalence and civil rights. The Warren Court used judicial activism and judicial review to interpret the potency and infallibility of the Supreme Court to promote the importance of individual rights. If those individual rights were seen as infringed, the case was likely to be overturned. Warren presided over Brown v. Louisiana 1966, a case wh ere a black student was arrested for protesting a segregated library. Again the Warren Court looked to the 14th Amendments guaranteeing the freedom of speech and assembly, ruling that these rights are not confined to verbal expression.In another case the Warren Court ruled on Yates v. coupled States 1956. In this case the court overturned the convictions of Communist leaders under the metalworker Act. Under the Smith Act any person could be arrested and jailed for advocating the violent over throw of the United States government. The Court ruled that the Smith Act violated the defendants First Amendment rights. In short, the Warren court supplemented one of the most notable movements in the history of the United States, Warrens emphasis on individual rights and equality were stepping stones for Civil Rights activists, basically giving them protection under the Constitution.