Saturday, March 23, 2019
Legalization of Drugs Argument Essay -- Drug Prohibition Regulation Le
Legalization of Drugs contrastMan, as a creature, is inherently bored. Since the dawn of quantify, it has been thenatural instinct of hu soldiery to find alternative methods to enhance his being. Themany means by which man has turned to entangle sex, gambling, and the consumptionof effects beyond the requirements of nutrition. The consumption ofsubstances can be further broken down into legal and misappropriated substances. Thequestion and so becomes, who are we to place labels on certain substances bydeeming them legal and require others by creating penalties for their use?The issue of prohibition is certainly not a new one to our nation. In 1919, the18th Amendment prohibited the manufacture, sale or transportation of intoxicanticbeverages. Suddenly honest, responsible Americans who just wanted a drink, wereturned into criminals. Respectable bars became underground speak-easys, andlegitimate liquor manufacturers were replaced by criminal bootleggers. Gangwarfare, bribery, and criminal activity reached an all(a)-time high. Standards onillegal alcohol were much lower than those on the previously legal alcohol whichled to the blinding or death of many consumers. Finally in 1933, politiciansbuckled and repealed the 18th Amendment. The Prohibition attempt of the early20th century provides the holy historical support for the decriminalizationof drugs.Prohibition will work large(p) injury to the cause of temperance. It is a speciesof intemperance within itself, for it goes beyond the bounds of reason in thatit attempts to control a mans appetite by legislation, and makes a detestation out ofthings that are not crimes. A Prohibition right strikes a blow at the veryprinciples upon which our government was founded.The rise in violent crime over the years has been a concern to most. A majorcause of this increase in crime is the illegal trafficking of drugs. As violentcrime continues to increase, we are unable to sanctify our financial resources andtime in to preventing and prosecuting those who commit crimes such as murder,rape, and assault. The reason we are unable to devote these resources where theyare needed is because we are foolishly spending them on a battle that we cannotwin-the War on Drugs.Prior to Ronald Reagans War on Drugs, Americas crime rate had been declining.Since the introduction of the new wave drug... ...cal use. Research would also be encouraged as scientists couldsearch for new and practical uses of drugs. There are many wonderful uses ofdrugs that micturate not yet been identified or perfected and with expanded research,we could discover these new possibilities.Of course, some restrictions would have to be set. Likely, an age restrictionwould have to be adopted. Restricting the use of drugs to adults only, andeducating the youth of the potential dangers should help curb adolescent abuse.Prohibiting acts such as driving force a vehicle under the influence of a mind-altering substance would likewise be necess ary. Another necessity would be thedestruction of all those with prior criminal records due to the arrest orconviction on drug-related charges. Of course, the right of the non-smoker wouldhave to be paramount. In a public facility, non-smoking areas would have to beset up.A system of drug regulation that would include the above provisions, publichealth and agricultural regulations, and a form of tax would discourageabuse, protect public health and safety, reduce crime, and raise revenue. formula is the inevitable replacement of prohibition.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment